Archive

Archive for the ‘madge’ Category

FBI Lawsuit Update – Part 3

April 1, 2010 Comments off

 

Robert S. Mueller

This a follow up to yesterday’s article FBI Lawsuit Update – Part 2. As standard in Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) cases with very incriminating files the FBI/DOJ wishes to hide in violation of FOIA, the FBI/DOJ have been stonewalling me in court, using the same flawed, lawless arguments they’ve used VERBATIM in other cases, according to Pacer searches, to violate the Freedom of Information Act. So much for government transparency in the Obama Administration.

The following is a link to the case documents, revealing their unlawful argument that the Civil Rights Act and Civil Rights Act of 1964 do not apply to the FBI, DOJ and FBI Director Robert S. Mueller and as such, they do not have to obey said laws, which is a blatant lie.

The fact of the matter is the FBI and DOJ receive “federal financial assistance” and under the Civil Rights Act, they are not allowed to discriminate against anyone. 

Robert S. Mueller cowardly invoked the U.S. government’s “immunity shield” in the case, as he broke the law at my expense. However, there exists no “immunity shield” granting any member of the U.S. government to break the law.

They are hiding the FOIA files I am entitled to, as the files relating to the Madonna case are really bad and the files regarding Robert S. Mueller violating my Fourth Amendment rights, are incriminating to him.

Therefore, there is a conflict of interest in him not releasing the files, as he broke the law in spying on me and others, in misconduct I outed him for online in a time stamped, copyrighted  2006 article proven true and correct 3 months later via the report of the U.S. government’s Inspector General. Mueller and FBI agents were later excoriated for the misconduct in the U.S. Congress in what became a scandal they had to address.

Robert S. Mueller had their legal representation in the case state it is at his discretion whether or not the FBI brings justice in cases. He deliberately ordered FBI agents to drag their feet on the investigation though my life is in danger and instructed them to conceal the Freedom of Information Act files, to allow Madonna and co. to further steal copyrights.

Mueller is also a man that for years deliberately sat on the terrible financial crimes of Bernard Madoff and R. Allen Stanford. This ladies and gentlemen is why the economy collapsed – the man that has been left in charge of law enforcement kisses up to rich criminals, allowing them to steal from hardworking people, as that is crooked Muller’s definition of success. To anyone else with any sense, that’s a house of cards waiting to collapse…and it did.

Madonna and co. are still criminally stealing from my Copyrighted Catalog. Her ex-husband and father of her child, Guy Ritchie and his alleged film “Sherlock Holmes” is a complete rip off a years old, preexisting copyright from my Copyrighted Catalog.

Guy Ritchie’s rip off

Guy Ritchie stole the modern remake idea from my copyrights – then stole other years old scenes from my preexisting, Library of Congress registered, Copyrighted Catalog that contains 12,500 songs, 1000 movie scripts, movie treatments and short stories, 15 book manuscripts, 300 music video treatments, 500 photographs, 100 photo treatments, perfume, clothing line, nano-technology, a solar cell phone and thousands of other items.

Guy Ritchie is disgusting – every film he has ever made has a copyright infringement lawsuit against it, as he steals everyone else’s property.  He’s been sued in five unrelated cases by different people for stealing their movie scripts and TV projects.

He recently announced he is starting a record label. Ritchie, who knows nothing about music and is famous for having sex with a crazy pop star, is starting a record label. No doubt, it is to steal.

In all of this, FBI Director Robert S. Mueller reminds me of the lead Nazi the film, The Aryan Couple, criminally taking and redistributing the property of others to fellow Nazis, under a sick, racist premise that whites are superior to others and everyone else is slave labor to exploit.

The only massive problem is, while Mueller unlawfully helps dirty Hollywood stars in lining their pockets via criminally stealing copyrights whose proceeds are meant to go towards cures to AIDS and Cancer, millions of people are dying from the aforementioned diseases. God is not going to bless you all for that. God have mercy on your souls.

Click Here For Court Documents

RELATED ARTICLES

FBI Lawsuit Update – Part 2

FBI Lawsuit Update – Part 2

April 1, 2010 Comments off

Obama Administration Violating Transparency Promise On White House Website

If It Continues The Judiciary Report Will Not Vote For Or Support Him In 2012    

U.S. President Barack Obama 

The FBI, DOJ and Robert S. Mueller are currently trying to get Judge Martinez to make a precedent setting ruling that the Civil Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 did not give black people equal rights under the law, equal access to law enforcement services and does not apply to the FBI, DOJ and its employees, claiming they are exempt from the legal consequences of violating the Civil Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which they have done at my expense.

This article is in relation to the Aisha v FBI lawsuit, which President Obama was sent a copy of, along with a letter, in July 2009. The U.S. Postal Service provided delivery confirmation attesting they received it. The lawsuit was filed on August 31, 2009 and Obama’s FBI and Department of Justice, headed by Eric Holder, continue to stonewall me, in unlawfully refusing to release Freedom of Information Act files I have formally requested.
In essence, they have discredited the Freedom of Information Act and are currently challenging the Civil Rights Act and Civil Rights Act of 1964, via the unconscionable written motions of their legal representation, Department of Justice lawyer, Carole M. Fernandez.

Judge Jose E. Martinez (left) a former Department of Justice employee is presiding over the case Aisha v. FBI/Department of Justice.

I sued under the Freedom of Information Act, The Civil Rights Act, The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Fourth Amendment. Defendants Robert S. Mueller, the FBI and DOJ have not denied they’ve wiretapped me, scanned my email boxes and used the FBI’s CIPAV software trojan on my computers, violating my Fourth Amendment rights, which led to me breaking the story about their conduct in December 2006, which was proven true and correct 3 months later in the Inspector General’s official report.
However, the are challenging the Civil Rights Act in the case, via attorney, Carole M. Fernandez, claiming the FBI, DOJ and their employees are exempt from observing it, which is offensive, racist, legally unsound and reprehensible (I will post the legal documents in another update tomorrow so you can read it for yourself).

Carole M. Fernandez’s legal premise should alarm the 40 million black people in America and 100 million minorities in the United States as well. Following her offensive legal premise, if the FBI, DOJ or any of its counterparts wish to harass, terrorize, assault, beat or harass you, invade your privacy, bring back slavery, deny you entrance to restaurants, gyms or schools and block you from receiving law enforcement services, in violation of the Civil Rights Act and Civil Rights Act of 1964, according to her, due to the fact they work for the U.S. government, they can violate said the Civil Rights Act and Civil Rights Act of 1964, as it does not apply to them. Let that sink in.

Obama’s Attorney General, Eric Holder, is head of the Justice Department, is aiding FBI Director Robert S. Mueller in hiding incriminating Freedom of Information Act documents

The judge presiding over the case is Jose E. Martinez, who according to biographical information, was the regional director of the Office for Drug Abuse Law Enforcement of Defendant the Department of Justice from 1972 to 1974.

Carole M. Fernandez, is attempting to get Judge Jose E. Martinez to rule according to this unlawful premise, which would in essence, make it case law that the FBI, DOJ and its employees are exempt from observing and following the Civil Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

It’s bad enough I sustained a life threatening, unprecedented brain hemorrhage thanks to the FBI’s criminal negligence in the case, in allowing Madonna to rob me of copyrights and engage members of her sick Miami Kabbalah cult, located in Eastern Shores (Miami), to stalk, approach, harass and assault me. When I denounced the FBI’s criminal negligence online, an FBI employee contacted by email and phone and harassed and threatened me, in tandem with her co-worker. I had the brain hemorrhage shortly after, as that’s when it dawned on me they had no intention of bringing justice in the case.

And this is after I furnished them with credible information in writing and verbally in 2005, that was used during the Anthony Pellicano trial to help secure a conviction. Words from what I wrote was used verbatim in the trial.

The FBI vowed three times to me they are investigating the Madonna case and would issue a report on it, which is standard in said investigations, but they lied  and I almost died as a result. That should let the public know the FBI can’t be trusted and their word means nothing, so be careful about telling them anything, as their promises are worthless. They are treacherous and dishonorable.

When you see a law enforcement agency repeatedly sued by its own agents for racism and retaliation against minority agents, as the FBI has been, watch out, they are racist and hateful towards minority victims of crime as well. 

     

Robert S. Mueller – tried to hide behind the government’s “Immunity Shield” in the lawsuit, for unlawfully wiretapping me, scanning my emails and using the FBI’s software Trojan CIPAV to gain access to my computer documents

Currently, I’m still struggling with the lingering effects of the unprecedented brain hemorrhage and due to medication that I was prescribed by Jackson Memorial Hospital, for the terrible headaches and head pains associated with the hemorrhage, Topamax, I developed another life threatening medical issue, known as Metabolic Acidosis, which sent me to the emergency room on November 25, 2009. I have discontinued the medication.

However, rather than do the honorable thing, via making amends for their misconduct and releasing the Freedom of Information Act files I am entitled to under the law, Obama’s FBI and Justice Department decided while I’m sick is the time to strike and antagonize me with deceit and roundabout motions, stonewalling a physically sick person. 

Never mind, I’m still being harassed and stalked by Madonna’s Kabbalah kooks and the copyright infringement has not desisted, therefore the FBI/DOJ have deliberately failed to do their jobs. There was another incident on New Years Eve, in the afternoon, where a crazy Kabbalah member I have seen before, stalked me for three blocks when I went for a walk in my neighborhood, then charged at me with her menacing dog. If I hadn’t quickly crossed the street I would have been attacked.

The FBI has no excuse. I even entered into court evidence last week, a DVD disc of cell phone photos of Miami Kabbalah members that have stalked, approached and harassed me. One recently followed me into a bank and harassed me in the presence of my mother. She said she is a member of the Miami branch of Kabbalah and had the red string bracelet on. These Kabbalah members should not be following and coming up to me, as it is illegal.

Obama Violating Campaign Promise On Transparency

Obama and his Department Of Justice have been under fire recently for their blatant lack of transparency. They stonewalled the U.S. Congress in the aftermath of Fort Hood. They stonewalled Alan Keyes in his lawsuit to determine Obama’s citizenship status, via violating the Freedom of Information Act in improperly withholding incriminating documents. That case is scheduled for a hearing this month. Obama’s Department Of Justice was sanctioned by a Kansas Court this week for lack of transparency and a refusal to answer questions during discovery.

Now they are stonewalling me on the Freedom of Information Act files I properly requested and now sued for, even though my life is at stake, which under Department Of Justice rules, is a reason FOIA files must be released.

My life is at stake two fold – if I sustain another hemorrhage, which can occur due to harassment and undue stress (like Madonna and Kabbalah are still doing), it has a high probably of being FATAL. In addition, Kabbalah members are still stalking, harassing and trying to attack me at Madonna’s behest – a cult whose members have been in murderous confrontations with innocent people (Fiona Davis, Gideon Busch and others).

If Obama’s DOJ, FBI and Robert S. Mueller, along with their legal representation, Carole A. Fernandez, continue to deprive me of my rights in court, the FOIA documents I’m entitled to and what I am due under the law as a result of the FBI, DOJ and Robert S. Mueller’s misconduct,

I SHALL NOT BE VOTING FOR OBAMA IN THE 2012 ELECTION AND SHALL ADVISE THE MILLIONS OF PEOPLE THAT READ MY WEBSITES NOT TO VOTE FOR HIM EITHER. THIS SITE WILL SUPPORT OBAMA NO LONGER.

My life has been placed in jeopardy and I am an innocent person. I will not tolerate it. You can’t ask for a worst example of government corruption than stonewalling and depriving a physically sick person of their rights in court.
RELATED ARTICLES

FBI Lawsuit Update – Part 1

 

FROM THE WHITE HOUSE WEBSITE (OBAMA):

Freedom of Information Act

MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES

SUBJECT: Freedom of Information Act

A democracy requires accountability, and accountability requires transparency. As Justice Louis Brandeis wrote, “sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants.” In our democracy, the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), which encourages accountability through transparency, is the most prominent expression of a profound national commitment to ensuring an open Government. At the heart of that commitment is the idea that accountability is in the interest of the Government and the citizenry alike.

The Freedom of Information Act should be administered with a clear presumption: In the face of doubt, openness prevails. The Government should not keep information confidential merely because public officials might be embarrassed by disclosure, because errors and failures might be revealed, or because of speculative or abstract fears. Nondisclosure should never be based on an effort to protect the personal interests of Government officials at the expense of those they are supposed to serve. In responding to requests under the FOIA, executive branch agencies (agencies) should act promptly and in a spirit of cooperation, recognizing that such agencies are servants of the public.

All agencies should adopt a presumption in favor of disclosure, in order to renew their commitment to the principles embodied in FOIA, and to usher in a new era of open Government. The presumption of disclosure should be applied to all decisions involving FOIA.

The presumption of disclosure also means that agencies should take affirmative steps to make information public. They should not wait for specific requests from the public. All agencies should use modern technology to inform citizens about what is known and done by their Government. Disclosure should be timely.

I direct the Attorney General to issue new guidelines governing the FOIA to the heads of executive departments and agencies, reaffirming the commitment to accountability and transparency, and to publish such guidelines in the Federal Register. In doing so, the Attorney General should review FOIA reports produced by the agencies under Executive Order 13392 of December 14, 2005. I also direct the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to update guidance to the agencies to increase and improve information dissemination to the public, including through the use of new technologies, and to publish such guidance in theFederal Register.

This memorandum does not create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

The Director of the Office of Management and Budget is hereby authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.

BARACK OBAMA

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/FreedomofInformationAct

FBI Lawsuit Update – Part 1

April 1, 2010 Comments off

Aisha v. FBI

Robert S. Mueller

In light of what happened last time in the Aisha v. Madonna case, the great incivility I was met with and the manner in which my human rights and Constitutional rights were vilely trampled, in violation of the law, I am going to disclose all items concerning the case on this website to let you the public view and decide, with the hope it leads to greater government accountability and transparency (as Obama promised the world). The following are a list of updates thus far, since the filing of the case on August 31, 2009.

The case number for the Aisha v. FBI lawsuit is 09-22574-CIV-MARTINEZ-BROWN. The clerk forgot to stamp the case number on the lawsuit the day it was filed.

The judge is Jose Martinez. The magistrate judge is Steven Brown (the same magistrate judge from the 2005 Aisha v. Madonna case).

On September 1, 2009, the day after the case was filed, the judge issued a nine page order stating he wants a “Scheduling Conference” meeting between both parties click here

In the aforementioned judicial order regarding the “Scheduling Conference” the judge also requested a “Certificate of Interest” be filed by each side. I filed my “Certificate of Interest” a few weeks ago click here

I sent a copy of the 11 page “Scheduling Conference” order, in compliance with the judge’s aforementioned request, along with a cover letter, to the FBI’s lawyer click here

The three defendants Robert Mueller, The FBI and DOJ were served on September 15, 2009 and as they are a government agency, they have 60 days to respond, as opposed to the standard 20 click here

I filed a motion to correct to reflect a few minor errors (spelling of a name ect.) click here

Here is the mailing receipt showing confirmation of President Obama/White House receiving my letter and an advance draft of the Aisha v. FBI lawsuit click here.

I did not wish to write to Obama about this subject, but Robert Mueller and the FBI’s severe criminal negligence, left me no choice, as my life has been placed in danger. Repeated incidents of severe harassment that began increasing in frequency and becoming more hostile, clearly illustrates Madonna and co. are escalating their criminal and violent commissioned misconduct towards me, building up to something very bad.

Enough is enough. I haven’t done anything to these people, don’t know them and want nothing to do with them. I do not wish to end up dead like Michael Jackson and Sam Cooke, because a certain set of people are trying to steal my Copyrighted Catalog. What a disgrace those thieves are, going to such sick, evil extremes to steal from innocent people.

I recently filed a formal complaint with the DOJ Inspector General, regarding Mueller and co.’s misconduct in my case, as the Department of Justice’s website, states one is to do so under said circumstances.

Infringements

Singer Cheryl Cole of Girls Aloud and Simon Cowell on his show X-Factor

Regarding the ongoing infringements, Sony still leads the pack with the most instances of criminal copyright infringement.

Recent incidents of criminal copyright infringement include “Happy” by Leona Lewis via Syco(Simon Cowell)/Sony Music.

The video for “Bad Boys” by Alexandra Burke via Syco(Simon Cowell)/Sony Music, with Bryan Barber criminally taking credit and payment for my preexisting copyright, Syco passed to him.

“Fight For This Love” by Simon Cowell’s “X-Factor” co-host Cheryl Cole, with Steve Kipner, Andre Merritt and Wayne Wilkins criminally taking credit and payment for my preexisting copyright, Syco and co. passed to them.

And other new infringing items by Chris Brown (Sony) and his girlfriend Rihanna, who continue to steal from the Copyrighted Catalog.

Madonna’s latest single “Celebration” is also a criminal copyright infringement of a preexisting song in my Copyrighted Catalog, of the same name, which has been copyrighted for years. 

PLEASE BOYCOTT ALL THE AFOREMENTIONED ARTISTS AND SONY

Hacking

The illegal hacking into my computers by Madonna’s hackers at Digilink that is also of a very malicious nature, to not only snoop on the contents of my computers, but to damage and destroy the local copy of my websites in bids at blocking them from being updated six days a week, continues unabated.

This is amazingly occurring in spite of the aforementioned FBI lawsuit and the agency’s alleged pledge on their website regarding “preventing crime.” Apparently the sick Hollywood stars in the case, can say whatever garbage pops out of their illiterate, thieving mouths and onto their vile websites, but the Constitution and international human rights charters do not apply to me, via the right to having free speech and freed press.

Harassment

There was also a vile, unlawful incident of harassment and terrorization geared towards my mother by a Kabbalah affiliate (Madonna’s cult) as retaliation for me filing the FBI lawsuit. I am going to enter it into the case and post it to the site. When you read about what transpired, it is going to disgust and appall you. My mother nearly had a heart attack due to it and ended up in the hospital on September 30, 2009. She has since been released. She has since been released from the hospital.

As previously mentioned, on August 31, 2009, there was an incident at the Federal courthouse, via a red string bracelet wearing Kabbalah member and felon, named Alexis A. Palme, who followed me into said courthouse (his photo ID is on file, as one must show it to enter the building), after being sent to intimidate and browbeat me, on federal property (a felonious no-no), into not filing the FBI lawsuit, disclosing Madonna and Kabbalah’s sick misconduct (which I filed anyway).

BBC’s “Doctor Who” Admits Using People’s Names, Image And Likeness In Scripts

April 1, 2010 Comments off

This is a follow up to the October 12, 2009 post Madonna Invades Privacy Of Minors:

 Russell Davies

In an item mentioned in the August 2009 lawsuit Aisha v. FBI, regarding the BBC program “Doctor Who” using people’s real names, images and likeness to base characters on, in violation of the law (Right To Publicity) the people behind the program admitted yesterday that they have done such things.

The writers of the show arrogantly proclaimed yesterday that they took the image and likeness of politicians and others, used it for the show, but added defamatory and unflattering items to it. Yesterday they admitted, they took Margaret Thatcher’s name and made her into a very unflattering character named Rehctaht, which is her name spelled backwards.

Such conduct is plain lazy, uncreative, haughty, cowardly and nasty. However, what’s your excuse when you criminally misappropriate the names, images and likeness of minors for your programming, which you did to two of my younger relatives, in being nasty to me in unprovoked conduct commissioned by Madonna (see: Madonna Violates The Privacy Of Minors), as mentioned in the aforementioned lawsuit. How do you justify doing such a thing to kids.

I wasn’t kidding when I said I am going to sue you and write about you and I promise you, it will be emotionally painful, humiliating (for you) and spark changes to the law, when I get finished with you. Imagine that, using the Queen’s airwaves to terrorize people.

RELATED ARTICLE

Madonna Violates The Privacy Of Minors

Top BBC Executive Charged As Pedophile

BBC scriptwriters tried to use Doctor Who to bring down Margaret Thatcher

Last updated at 8:55 AM on 15th February 2010

She battled the Argentine army abroad and the unions at home. But Margaret Thatcher never knew she was also under attack from outer space.

Left-wing scriptwriters hired by the BBC during the 1980s tried to inspire a ‘Tardis revolution’ by using Doctor Who as propaganda to undermine the Tory prime minister.

In one serial they caricatured her as a vicious and egotistical alien ruler who banned outward displays of unhappiness among her downtrodden people and used a secret police to oppress dissidents.

Former actors and writers on the show admitted yesterday that there was also thinly veiled support for the miners’ strike and the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament…

‘The idea of bringing politics into Doctor Who was deliberate. We were a group of politically motivated people and it seemed the right thing to do.’ …

‘I was very angry about the social injustice in Britain under Thatcher and I’m delighted that came into the show.’

But he added: ‘Critics, media pundits and politicians didn’t pick up on what we were doing. Nobody really noticed or cared.’

The ratings plunged to 3million and the series was taken off air, reappearing for a one-off episode in 1996 before the hit 2005 revival.

A BBC spokesman said: ‘We’re baffled by these claims. The BBC’s impartiality rules applied just as strongly then as they do now.’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk

Madonna Invades The Privacy Of Minors

October 12, 2009 Comments off

Russell Davies

As stated in the August 31, 2009 lawsuit, Aisha v. The FBI, Madonna and members of her depraved, disgraceful Kabbalah cult, such as television writer/producer, Russell Davies (Hollywood’s “Queer as Folk” and the BBC’s “Doctor Who” and “Torchwood”) not only infringed my PREEXISTING copyrights, but violated my privacy as well and that of my family and friends, using it as the basis for select episodes of the BBC programs “Torchwood” and “Doctor Who.”

For more on that, here is an excerpt from the August 31, 2009 lawsuit, Aisha v. The FBI et al, relevant to this article:

24. Madonna then spread her invasive madness to her label affiliate BBC in London where she lived (BBC’s DVDs are distributed by Madonna’s Warner Bros). The BBC is familiar with Aisha’s family, having worked with her dad and aunt. Previously, in 2004, the BBC called Aisha’s dad, renowned musicologist and disc jockey, Vaughn “Bunny” Goodison, in Jamaica over the telephone, for an interview on the passing of his esteemed, lifelong friend and music legend, 72-year-old, Clement Dodd. On another occasion, the BBC telephoned Aisha’s dad for comment on the passing of famous charity worker, 87-year-old, Sister Mary Ignatius Davies, who was also a good friend of the family. These interviews were carried on BBC radio and on their websites. Aisha’s aunt, Jamaica’s award winning, highly rated, poet laureate, Lorna Goodison, had also done pleasant radio and print interviews with the BBC. Therefore, the family had maintained a good relationship with the BBC, but Madonna, driven by ill-will and hatred, resenting the famous arts family, due to Aisha’s very valuable, groundbreaking Copyrighted Catalog she covets and Aisha’s refusal to respond to her correspondences, viciously sponsored a Kabbalah styled case of gross invasion of privacy and copyright infringement, through BBC employees and Kabbalah members, Russell Davies and Billie Piper (Madonna’s protégé), aimed at vindictively targeting and maligning the award winning family. The family at no time did anything to Madonna, Davies or Piper, not knowing any of them, yet acting in concert with Madonna, they began to place items from Aisha’s preexisting Copyrighted Catalog and astonishingly her personal life as well, in his BBC scripts.

25. Davies infringed Aisha’s copyrights for select episodes of the BBC shows “Doctor Who” and “Torchwood” and additionally, included Aisha’s personal, identifying information unique to her, in his scripts. These items were obtained through hacking by the staff of Madonna.com. Davies, who has visited Aisha’s official websites, before and after the misconduct transpired, as attested by Traffic Facts site statistics software, has followed Madonna’s lead and taken broadcasting to an unprecedented low in Britain for the “Children of Earth” five part series on the “Torchwood” program he writes for. The “Children of Earth” broadcast not only includes items from preexisting, protected items from Aisha’s computers, using it for the main storyline of the 5 part miniseries, it also includes Aisha’s mother’s name “MILLIE” as a character, a variation of AISHA’s name in the script as a character named “MISHA”, a look-alike character that is the spitting image of Aisha’s sister, casting the character as a girl who is maliciously exploited and thrown in prison, the name CLEMENT mcDOnalD, a variation of the name CLEMENT DODD, appears in the script as an elderly character (CLEMENT DODD is Aisha’s aforementioned godmother’s husband, who invented reggae music and signed Bob Marley to his first record deal). There is also a character named MR. DEKKER, which is the real name of one of CLEMENT DODD’s legendary, award winning, international reggae recording colleagues and Aisha’s dad’s late friend, MR. DESMOND DEKKER. The CLEMENT and DEKKER names were cast as psychotic, despised, crazy characters running from aliens, which is disrespectful to the memory of the two, real, beloved, legendary Jamaican national heroes in the music field, which the names were distastefully taken from, in a racist manner by Russell Davies and Madonna’s Kabbalah. Other invasive items that infringe Aisha’s preexisting copyrights were included in select episodes of Russell Davies’ show “Doctor Who.” …

27. Other members of Madonna’s Kabbalah such as Sacha Baron Cohen, have been outed using real people for characters in TV shows and movies, such as “Ali G” being based on BBC radio disc jockey Tim Westwood and 2009’s Austrian character “Bruno” being illegally based on Austrian TV personality Alfons Haider. In 2009, Madonna’s partner and Kabbalah member, Jerry Bruckheimer was also sued for perversely basing a defamatory episode of “CSI” on a real live couple that owns a Los Angeles real estate firm, Scott and Melinda Tamkin, with the show using their real names and lives for the broadcast without permission, but defaming them as reckless people participating in sexual bondage, pornography, drunkenness and murder, in similar conduct to what Aisha had formally accused Bruckheimer of in her 2005 lawsuit against Madonna.

Since the filing of the lawsuit several weeks ago, I have discovered my teenage godbrother’s privacy and that of his mother, who live in South Florida in America, were violated during the case, as he, his mother and I, exchange emails very often and speak on the phone regularly, which was illegally wiretapped Anthony Pellicano style (Madonna’s private investigator, whom I gave the FBI detailed information about in 2005 and he was later arrested and convicted on wiretapping charges – see lawsuit for more information).

During one of the many hacks into my computer, which were traced back to Digilink, who is the web hosting company for Madonna’s official website Madonna.com, not only was my very valuable preexisting Copyrighted Catalog copied and then infringed by Madonna and her cohorts in Hollywood, my emails, both business and personal, were illegally copied, as mentioned in the lawsuit.

As stated in the lawsuit and mentioned above in the excerpt, Madonna’s Kabbalah member, homosexual Russell Davies (and his “Doctor Who” actress, Madonna protégé and Kabbalah cult member, Billie Piper) infringed preexisting copyrights belonging to me, for select episodes of “Torchwood” and “Doctor Who” and additionally included items in the script, such as the names of my family members and friends in the “Children Of Earth” 5-part miniseries on “Torchwood.”

Skins

Recently, I saw a bio page for the BBC/E4 program “Skins.” The homosexual father and son team of Bryan Elsley and Jamie Brittain, who are the writers and creators of the extremely dysfunctional and distasteful teen show “Skins” was mentioned in conjunction with Madonna’s Kabbalah member Russell Davies. The article stated Bryan Elsley and Jamie Brittain used to work for Russell Davies. They are also Davies’ BBC co-workers.

Now, imagine my horror and repulsion, when I scrolled down the character list for the show “Skins” and see my godbrother’s name “JJ Jones” listed as a character (his first name is John, but his family and friends call him “JJ”).

Imagine my horror again, when I read about the character and realize said character not only has my godbrother’s name, mimicking the sick conduct Madonna/Davies did to my family, but also infringes his image and likeness as well. This infringing character was created when my godbrother was 17-years-old. He is now 19.

Things the character on “Skins” has in common with my godbrother “JJ Jones”:

1. The name “JJ Jones”
2. 17-years of age
3. Wears braces
4. Grew his hair out a bit (his mom kept commenting on it, as she wanted him to cut it)
5. Lives with his mom a single parent
6. A very smart student
7. Hangs out often with his two best friends
8. Has a penchant for drinking Tropicana (an American, Florida brand of fruit juice that amazingly appears in a British show)

How does the BBC explain, how people connected to Madonna via Kabbalah, not only wound up in criminal possession of an illegally made copy of my Copyrighted Catalog, infringing items from it via using them without permission, but said characters in the infringing programs, now mysteriously have my mother’s name MILLIE, a variation of my name AISHA (“MISHA“), a look alike character that looks a great deal like my sister, the name my of my godmother’s husband who invented reggae music CLEMENT DODD (turned into the variant name “CLEMENT mcDOnalD“) and his colleague, the late reggae legend, DESMOND DEKKER‘s name used as “MR. DEKKER” in the programming (Note: My dad interviewed Desmond Dekker’s family on his radio show, listened to by millions around the world, shortly before Russell Davies did this invasive madness) and now my godbrother’s name, image and likeness, appears along with the other infringements, as characters penned by these same writers, Russell Davies, Bryan Elsley and Jamie Brittain.

Let’s not forget, prior to this, the BBC called my dad, a renowned musicologist, twice in Jamaica for interviews on famous public figures that are friends of the family. I kept wondering how they got his number. They also interviewed my aunt, an award winning author, Lorna Goodison, prior to all this as well.

Therefore, the BBC does know my family. Not to mention, the BBC has come up in my website stats numerous times, before and after these incidents regarding Russell Davies, Bryan Elsley and Jamie Brittain transpired.

It’s bad enough for Madonna and co. to violate my privacy, but while their invasiveness was going on, she and her comrades at the BBC, invaded the privacy of my sister and godbrother, who were minors at the time this unlawful activity began. That is absolutely criminal.

I am also of the belief, they found out what my sister looks like and based the aforementioned “Torchwood” character on her (“Lois” from Torchwood’s “Children of Earth), via photos I had taken of her at the airport, that I emailed to her in Jamaica, after I extracted them from the card of my digital camera.

“Lois” from Torchwood’s “Children of Earth” looks like my sister. I asked my mom and another relative to look at the picture and tell me what they think and they said she does look like her (except, my sister usually has her hair straight – however, in the photos that I took of her at the airport and emailed to her, she had the front of her hair braided):


“Lois”

Violating the privacy of minors is a very serious crime. Turning two minors, that are private citizens, into characters on TV, at the request of a sick, devilish pop star, Madonna, invading innocent people’s privacy and harassing others, as she is psychopathic and obsessed out of her non-singing mind, is disgusting and nasty.

Russell Davies, Bryan Elsley and Jamie Brittain, have also added other very defamatory and sick items to the characters lives, based on my sister and godbrother, that are more than enough grounds for criminal charges and a lawsuit.

Once again, Madonna and co. have gone too far. The worst part in all this is, we are innocent people that have nothing to do with Madonna or her lunatic Kabbalah cult members like Davies.

And I promise you, all that are involved in committing this foul, nasty misconduct on those shows, that criminally invaded the privacy of minors, will see the inside of a prison cell before this is all over. You have my word on it.

Do, pray tell, what did my young sister and godbrother do to you? They are two good, decent, hardworking kids that make great grades in school and are trying to live their lives.

How did they deserve for a group of vile, despicable, perverted lunatics to invade their privacy and beam their lives, image, likeness and in my godbrother’s case, his actual name, around the world (his mom’s distinct last name that is different from his, was also used for a Russell Davies’ TV character on “Torchwood”).

Do stand up like men, albeit cowardly homosexual men, obsessed with underage boys and girls – and tell the world what my young sister and godbrother, who do not even know you at all, nor do I, did to you that they deserve this criminal nastiness and invasiveness you’ve done in conjunction with your fellow Kabbalah cult member Madonna. You must be so proud of yourselves spying on and picking on underage youths, you perverts.

Really, what if I took the low road, as Madonna has done once again and cast a character in one of my scripts with her daughter’s name, writing that the 12-year-old girl is to be dressed like an underage prostitute, trying to be sexy for the camera. Oh wait, Madonna has done that to her daughter already for her latest video, trying to shock people for attention.

Madonna

Regarding, Russell Davies, Bryan Elsley and Jamie Brittain, what if I pen a script, casting your respective parents’ names, image and likeness, as characters that molest kids and pee on them in the woods, as singer Elton John was accused of doing, by the Sun Newspaper UK. How would you feel about that.

I can get their names off Wikipedia if you’d like (and knowing Wikipedia, there is a 99% probability the names would be wrong, anyway).

But I wouldn’t do something like that. Because at the end of the day, one has to ask one’s self, what kind of sick people do things like that, you know, as you have done to my innocent family and I, who’ve done you no harm.

Once again, if the shiftless, useless, corrupt FBI had done their jobs from 2005, when they first received the case, those depraved animals could not have taken things to such sick levels, causing irreparable damage to innocent people, including minors, as mentioned above.

And the FBI wonders why I have nothing positive to write about them. Take a good look at that mess, as two young people have now been harmed, because you corruptly decided to let a foul, vile, dirty old pop star that audiences don’t even care about anymore, run loose with this madness, committing crime after crime, against innocent people, so she and Hollywood could criminally rip me off, as my Copyrighted Catalog is very valuable.

Then again, I shouldn’t be surprised that the FBI doesn’t care about kids, as it was widely reported, the FBI told the parents of missing children to buzz off.

You call that law enforcement. You are such unmitigated failures at what you do. Hands down, the worst law enforcement agency ever.

Obama Creates Cyber Security Branch (Hollywood Pedophiles)

June 7, 2009 Comments off

Obama Creates Cyber Security Branch

Hollywood Pedophiles

President Barack Obama

Today, President Barack Obama announced the creation of a Cyber Security department of the U.S. government to combat hacks into the national internet infrastructure.

Presently, the FBI has a computer intrusion department named “CIP” that goes by other names as well, but their performance has been very poor in stopping major hacks into domestic government and private sector computer networks.

Just last week, I read a feedback column link that led to an article featuring a U.S. general stating America may begin to respond to cyber attacks with military force.

During the press conference today, President Obama spoke of people breaking the law by “hacking” into computers and “stealing intellectual property” (copyrights, trademarks and patents).

Note to Madonna: he’s talking about you, witch!

President Obama even referred to a company that lost $400,000,000 via this criminal practice. It appears Madonna and her associates in Hollywood have set the new standard for dirty business dealings in this regard among criminals, creating a nasty template for others to follow. Hollywood private investigator, Anthony Pellicano, had hackers on staff that specialized in this deceitful, illegal practice. Madonna was one of his clients.

As many of you have also witnessed, when I write something on the site that is unflattering about Madonna, my websites (and computers) get hacked, sabotaged and delayed.

Intellectual property theft is vile, cowardly, lazy and disgraceful. It says to the country and the world, one is too dumb and untalented to author creative works, therefore one will take the dishonorable route of stealing from others’ federally registered intellectual property.

In my case, the thefts of my copyrights became very malicious and sick. For example, Madonna’s cohorts at Lions Gate, a defendant in the 2005 Aisha v. Madonna case, which the latter bought out in violation of criminal statues, went so far, as to arrogantly and criminally steal more copyrights from me two years later in 2007.

The commercial and critical flop “Good Luck Chuck” was stolen from my copyrights. To be nasty, this is what they did with my preexisting copyright they butchered with their stupidity and vileness.

My preexisting copyright was a wonderful, romantic, fictitious movie treatment I wrote about an affluent man on a dating site and women finding out about it and flocking to him. The later released Lions Gate film “Good Luck Chuck” is about an affluent man, whose profile is posted on a dating site and women flocking to him.

That’s an illegal duplication of my copyright, which Madonna criminally gained an unlawfully made copy of, along with my voluminous Copyrighted Catalog, via criminal hacking, performed by Digilink, the company that began hosting her website Madonna.com several years ago.

Here’s where it gets really sick. In the infringing film “Good Luck Chuck” they added items not in my copyright, such as crass, pornographic sex scenes and a character named ANISHA which is one letter away from my real, legal name AISHA. Not to mention, the lead female character in the film, played by Jessica Alba, is named “CAM” and one of my private nicknames I use is “KAM” short for my middle name KAMILAH. They are both pronounced the same as well.

It was a stupid and criminally incriminating thing to do. The infringing film “Good Luck Chuck” constitutes major violations of the law and is more than enough to obtain a devastating indictment and convictions, for all involved, for criminal copyright infringement, computer intrusion and violations of various human rights laws.

Hollywood Pedophiles

Here’s where the infringement “Good Luck Chuck” gets even sicker. The character ANISHA starts off as an 8-year-old girl (which coincidentally is the age I immigrated to America from Jamaica).

To be nasty, they made this character a goth 8-year-old virgin wearing a leather bra, trying to lose her virginity in a closet with an 8-year-old boy (never happened to me by the way, as I took a Christian vow of chastity until marriage, which I wrote about on my site a few years ago in the Q&A section).

However, Lions Gate turned my wholesome, romantic, copyright about a grown, affluent man on a dating site and grown women finding out about it and flocking to him, into a nasty, depraved, promiscuous piece of pornographic garbage.

The nasty PEDOPHILES at Lions Gate should be locked up for not only criminal copyright infringement and hacking, but for filming and broadcasting that piece of nastiness featuring the character ANISHA, an 8-year-old, underage, preteen girl in a black leather bra, skimpy skirt, black lipstick and goth hairstyle, trying to have sex in a closet with an 8-year-old boy. The scene is disgusting and PEDOPHILIC. You’re nasty PEDOPHILES for thinking that is filmable entertainment.

It reveals the sick levels of mental illness present in Hollywood that they could do something so deplorable. This is the terrible level of mental illness the FBI has running loose around the streets of Los Angeles.

Hollywood is disgusting and severely mentally ill. You need serious counseling with a side order of institutionalization.

Imagine that. I have been quietly working on copyrights and patents to improve people’s health and you animals are criminally robbing and defaming me with my own copyrighted work, in criminal violation of the law. What nasty message do you think that sends to the public about you.

But, it is the same sick pattern of mental illness rearing its ugly head throughout the case I reported to the FBI that they claim they are investigating.

As mentioned the other day, Madonna recently, criminally stole another of my preexisting copyrights, that has been sitting in the Library of Congress in D.C. from 2006, that is my life story and ripped it off in a sick, obsessive manner, for her so-called directorial debut “Filth And Wisdom.”

The lead character in Madonna’s rip off “Filth And Wisdom” is an immigrant named A.K. aspiring to be a singer, writer and poet. In my 2006 preexisting copyrighted movie script, I star in the biopic as myself, an immigrant aspiring to be a singer, writer and poet, whose initials are A.K. (short for “Aisha Kamilah”).

What kind of sickos criminally steal copyrights from a writer, then include the defrauded writer’s name in the script as a character. That screams severe mental illness and sends the nation and the world a horrific message about Hollywood.

Madonna and co. even stole one of my copyrights about my homeland Jamaica, where I lived for years and Miami, where I’ve lived for two and a half decades, adding slurs to the script, sure to offend Jamaica and even started making arrangements to fly to Jamaica to begin filming it.

I’ve quietly been living in Miami for 25 years. I have no criminal record or history of strange conduct. I have a genius level IQ and spend my time at home, on my computers, doing research work and authoring patents and copyrights. I spend a lot of time authoring items for science and medical patents, to improve people’s health and quality of life.

I don’t bother people. I don’t go to clubs, industry parties, none of that. Yet, the aforementioned animals in Hollywood have been viciously targeting, robbing and attacking me, unprovoked and invading my privacy in very sick ways.

Who could be happy or pleased with that kind of criminal interference in their life. It’s disgraceful. The human rights abuses and civil rights violations I have been subjected to are so sick.

Her conduct and that of her cronies in Hollywood has been ugly and unjustifiable. There is no excuse for it.

RELATED ARTICLES

Sony’s Madness

Obama’s Remarks On Cybersecurity

Friday, May 29, 2009 – President Obama’s remarks on his administration’s cybersecurity review on Friday in the East Room of the White House:

I know how it feels to have privacy violated because it has happened to me and the people around me. It’s no secret that my presidential campaign harnessed the Internet and technology to transform our politics. What isn’t widely known is that during the general election hackers managed to penetrate our computer systems. To all of you who donated to our campaign, I want you to all rest assured, our fundraising website was untouched. (Laughter.) So your confidential personal and financial information was protected.

But between August and October, hackers gained access to emails and a range of campaign files, from policy position papers to travel plans. And we worked closely with the CIA — with the FBI and the Secret Service and hired security consultants to restore the security of our systems. It was a powerful reminder: In this Information Age, one of your greatest strengths — in our case, our ability to communicate to a wide range of supporters through the Internet — could also be one of your greatest vulnerabilities…

But every day we see waves of cyber thieves trolling for sensitive information — the disgruntled employee on the inside, the lone hacker a thousand miles away, organized crime, the industrial spy and, increasingly, foreign intelligence services. In one brazen act last year, thieves used stolen credit card information to steal millions of dollars from 130 ATM machines in 49 cities around the world — and they did it in just 30 minutes. A single employee of an American company was convicted of stealing intellectual property reportedly worth $400 million. It’s been estimated that last year alone cyber criminals stole intellectual property from businesses worldwide worth up to $1 trillion.

In short, America’s economic prosperity in the 21st century will depend on cybersecurity…

This new approach starts at the top, with this commitment from me: From now on, our digital infrastructure — the networks and computers we depend on every day — will be treated as they should be: as a strategic national asset. Protecting this infrastructure will be a national security priority. We will ensure that these networks are secure, trustworthy and resilient. We will deter, prevent, detect, and defend against attacks and recover quickly from any disruptions or damage.

To give these efforts the high-level focus and attention they deserve — and as part of the new, single National Security Staff announced this week — I’m creating a new office here at the White House that will be led by the Cybersecurity Coordinator. Because of the critical importance of this work, I will personally select this official. I’ll depend on this official in all matters relating to cybersecurity, and this official will have my full support and regular access to me as we confront these challenges…

http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com

Madonna Escalates Criminal Conduct

August 20, 2008 Comments off

Assault, Threatening Emails And Radio Station Harassment

NOTE 6-26-08: Madonna’s hackers from this case who works at Digilink which is the company that hosted her site Madonna.com for years have been hacking the site and deleting photos from this article. I am working to fix the problem.

Do you recall in my April 2, 2008 Hollywood Wiretap And Harassment Trial Reveals Pattern Of Abusing Innocent People article, where I wrote about how someone tried to run me over with a car last summer, and it later being revealed as an Anthony Pellicano tactic in his trial several weeks ago (Anthony Pellicano was Madonna’s private investigator, and that of her lawyer and manager as well).

Well, it happened again and this time my mother was with me. Two days ago, on July 23, 2008 at approximately 12:40 PM, someone tried to run over my mother and I in a Walgreens parking lot. My mother is an elderly woman that walks with a cane due to Guillain Barre Syndrome.

The man saw me walking with my mother in the parking lot, yet he swiftly hopped into his van, and without pause, quickly started it with the keys he had in his hands, accelerated backwards and tried to back over us. I started yelling at the top of my lungs when I realized what he was doing.

That’s when my mother, who was squarely behind the van and was going to get crushed by it looked up, and tried to move quicker, but not quick enough, so I started yanking her out of the way and that’s when he stopped, right before he would have mowed us down. People heard me yelling and started looking and that’s what made him stop.

He got out as calm and as apathetic as can be, insincerely said “sorry” with this dismissive attitude, got back in the van and left. I’ve never seen anything like that in my life. I lived many years without anyone ever trying to run over me, but since this Madonna mess started, it’s happened more than once. Getting worse and more malicious each time.

Threatening Emails

I’ve noticed a pattern, that right before Madonna and co. are about to commission an act of mischief against me, I receive an email to my site with a veiled threat, that traces back to Madonna’s hosting company at Digilink.

Digilink is the company who for years hosted Madonna.com and has been caught hacking into my business computers, copying the contents, which included my Copyrighted Catalog of over 10,000 songs, 300 movie scripts and short stories and other items click here to read about it.

Days before this latest incident happened, I received an email with a veiled threat. Then another one again before it happened, containing a made up item, about a dog mauling someone so badly they end up in a coma. The email once again traces back to Madonna’s web site’s hosting company.

Madonna out walking with fellow Kabbalah cult member Gwen Paltrow

After that man tried to run us over in the parking lot, an hour later, as we were about to enter our home, walking along the side of our neighbor’s vacant house we use to lease (it’s a shortcut), my mother noticed a menacing, well groomed German Shepherd in the backyard. He looked like a guard dog and exhibited the signs of a canine that was about to pounce.

It terrified my mother. So we walked around the other way before the dog could get near us. Those dogs are not exactly harmless, as there are court cases of German Shepherds mauling smaller dogs and humans. I called my neighbor who previously leased the now vacant home to us and she told me she did not get a dog. So, I telephoned 311 and they said they would come remove the dog.

Then I remembered the email sent to my site from Madonna’s hosting company/hacker, with the made up story about a person ending up in a coma after being mauled by a dog, and again I thought about the pattern of the emails I’ve been receiving with veiled threats and taunts of things that later happened to me in the case, that once again traced back to people working for Madonna.

You know what the most recent email I received from Madonna’s hosting company/hacker two days ago is about – a made up item about a gunman killing people in a shooting.

Radio Station Harassment

Nova 919’s morning show djs (they look high)

Right after I wrote on the site about Madonna’s hosting company Digilink being the entity that’s been hacking into my business computers, copying my Copyrighted Catalog and docs, forwarding it to her and she illegally using it without permission, I received a seemingly normal email consisting of an “interview request” from someone named “Matt Gilbertson” in Adelaide, Australia. He requested an interview about the Madonna case. I’d done interviews about the case before, so I didn’t think much of it.

He gave very few details. Therefore, I emailed him back and asked what type of interview he wanted to conduct, “text or audio.” He wrote audio. I wrote back stating I would prefer text, thinking to myself this would provide a paper trail, lest he engaged in selective editing at my expense, as I don’t want anything jeopardizing the criminal case regarding Madonna’s aforementioned misconduct.

Hans’ email

He emailed me back stating “audio” is better for them. I emailed him back saying okay, so long as he understood the seriousness of the case (the criminal side of it) and kept the interview above board.

I wrote that because I Googled his name and he came up as “Hans” apart of an outrageous morning show on a Top 40 radio station in Adelaide called Nova 919 (when I think Nova, I think science, but that’s not the case here). He’s on the morning show with 3 other people. I’m not into gossip and really wasn’t in the mood for any foolishness regarding the case. He wrote back and stated the interview would be respectable, which turned out to be a lie.

Matt Gilbertson also known as “Hans.” He looks like Peter Pan. He looks like he belongs on a peanut butter jar:

I found a feature on their website for a Warner Bros. sponsored contest of him searching for Madonna. The day before the interview I decided to check their radio station site to see what he was saying in advance about the interview, and wouldn’t you know it, this two faced, duplicitous, spineless snake is claiming he’s “getting calls from America” about the case regarding me suing Madonna getting to boiling point.

He is talking on the air like I was the one who called him from America wanting an interview, when until he emailed me asking for an interview, I’d never even heard of the station.

I’ve never been stitched up before by a dude, and I use the term loosely, wearing fishnets.

I’m not disparaging the station as obscure, because due to their format (mainstream pop), they probably are not unknown in Adelaide, but pointing out the fact that most people only know their local stations.

I never initiated anything. They contacted me. Furthermore, which Americans are going to spend their hard earned cash during these hard times to make expensive long distance calls to Australia to tell a radio station that 99.9% of Americans never heard of, about a indie singer named Aisha stating Madonna stole her copyrighted music?

I don’t believe everyday Americans were calling all the way to Australia to tell him anything. I do believe Madonna and co. who are running a promotion at that station, put him up to it – just like she had her producer Timbaland contact my MySpace page via his, right before they were about to criminally steal more music from my Copyrighted Catalog again as mentioned here.

I got set up by a dude wearing a feathered boa.

He sets up the case on the air as some petit, minor civil infraction, where Madonna is being sued for stealing the song “American Life” – when the case is so much worse than that and has a terrible criminal angle.

Then one of his fellow on air personalities tries to be funny and chimes in that “American Life” is her worst performing single. Well, that’s what happens when a trashy, lip syncing pop star rips off and tries to sing soulful music written for a voice with several octaves.

They neglected to mention on air that she’s stolen several songs from my Copyrighted Catalog and lecherously used them for tracks on “Confessions On A Dance Floor” and once again on “Hard Candy” – and that she ripped off movie scripts as well from said preexisting Catalog of mine, for her ridiculous company Maverick.

Tell the truth, doesn’t Darren Hayes from Savage Garden look scared.

They announced on air that they’d be interviewing me on their next show. However, after hearing that crass, stitched up lead up to it, I emailed him back and told him I would not be doing the interview and do not call me.

I stated I’m “not desperate for publicity” and “don’t need the harassment.” I also wrote that the case is very serious, as the Civil Rights Act and U.N. Human Rights laws have been broken, and there’s nothing humorous about that.

The whole thing was nothing more than crazy Madonna and her little staff calling them in attempts to publicly discredit the case, because I posted concrete evidence that many have read, detailing how the hosting company for her web site Madonna.com repeatedly hacked into my computers and copied my Copyrighted Catalog that she illegally began to use without permission, which constitutes serious felonies.

Why does she persist in this misconduct, like no one can tell what she’s doing. Not to be arrogant, but since they went there with such malice, I will state this.

More people per month read my websites than bought your last album “Hard Candy.” My web sites are ranked higher than that of Nova 919 and most Warner Music Group sites. Therefore, which one of us is really in a position to publicly pimp slap the other. Let’s see, a.) I’m telling the truth about everything that’s been happening in this case b.) My sites get way more readers than you realize.

Think about that while you go back to your next session of trying to brainwash A-Rod, because if the trance broke, he would realize the wicked witch of the west (that’s you) is trying to steal him from his princess that gave birth to his kids.

Photo titled “A Rod In A Kabbalah Trance” at a Madonna concert courtesy of Don Chavez. Just look at his face. He doesn’t look his usual self. He looks brainwashed and bizarre.

http://www.judiciaryreport.com