Robert S. Mueller
This a follow up to yesterday’s article FBI Lawsuit Update – Part 2. As standard in Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) cases with very incriminating files the FBI/DOJ wishes to hide in violation of FOIA, the FBI/DOJ have been stonewalling me in court, using the same flawed, lawless arguments they’ve used VERBATIM in other cases, according to Pacer searches, to violate the Freedom of Information Act. So much for government transparency in the Obama Administration.
The following is a link to the case documents, revealing their unlawful argument that the Civil Rights Act and Civil Rights Act of 1964 do not apply to the FBI, DOJ and FBI Director Robert S. Mueller and as such, they do not have to obey said laws, which is a blatant lie.
The fact of the matter is the FBI and DOJ receive “federal financial assistance” and under the Civil Rights Act, they are not allowed to discriminate against anyone.
Robert S. Mueller cowardly invoked the U.S. government’s “immunity shield” in the case, as he broke the law at my expense. However, there exists no “immunity shield” granting any member of the U.S. government to break the law.
They are hiding the FOIA files I am entitled to, as the files relating to the Madonna case are really bad and the files regarding Robert S. Mueller violating my Fourth Amendment rights, are incriminating to him.
Therefore, there is a conflict of interest in him not releasing the files, as he broke the law in spying on me and others, in misconduct I outed him for online in a time stamped, copyrighted 2006 article proven true and correct 3 months later via the report of the U.S. government’s Inspector General. Mueller and FBI agents were later excoriated for the misconduct in the U.S. Congress in what became a scandal they had to address.
Robert S. Mueller had their legal representation in the case state it is at his discretion whether or not the FBI brings justice in cases. He deliberately ordered FBI agents to drag their feet on the investigation though my life is in danger and instructed them to conceal the Freedom of Information Act files, to allow Madonna and co. to further steal copyrights.
Mueller is also a man that for years deliberately sat on the terrible financial crimes of Bernard Madoff and R. Allen Stanford. This ladies and gentlemen is why the economy collapsed – the man that has been left in charge of law enforcement kisses up to rich criminals, allowing them to steal from hardworking people, as that is crooked Muller’s definition of success. To anyone else with any sense, that’s a house of cards waiting to collapse…and it did.
Madonna and co. are still criminally stealing from my Copyrighted Catalog. Her ex-husband and father of her child, Guy Ritchie and his alleged film “Sherlock Holmes” is a complete rip off a years old, preexisting copyright from my Copyrighted Catalog.
Guy Ritchie’s rip off
Guy Ritchie stole the modern remake idea from my copyrights – then stole other years old scenes from my preexisting, Library of Congress registered, Copyrighted Catalog that contains 12,500 songs, 1000 movie scripts, movie treatments and short stories, 15 book manuscripts, 300 music video treatments, 500 photographs, 100 photo treatments, perfume, clothing line, nano-technology, a solar cell phone and thousands of other items.
Guy Ritchie is disgusting – every film he has ever made has a copyright infringement lawsuit against it, as he steals everyone else’s property. He’s been sued in five unrelated cases by different people for stealing their movie scripts and TV projects.
He recently announced he is starting a record label. Ritchie, who knows nothing about music and is famous for having sex with a crazy pop star, is starting a record label. No doubt, it is to steal.
In all of this, FBI Director Robert S. Mueller reminds me of the lead Nazi the film, The Aryan Couple, criminally taking and redistributing the property of others to fellow Nazis, under a sick, racist premise that whites are superior to others and everyone else is slave labor to exploit.
The only massive problem is, while Mueller unlawfully helps dirty Hollywood stars in lining their pockets via criminally stealing copyrights whose proceeds are meant to go towards cures to AIDS and Cancer, millions of people are dying from the aforementioned diseases. God is not going to bless you all for that. God have mercy on your souls.
The Bad Publicity That Will Not Go Away
May 5. 2008
People are really laying into the show calling it everything from “fake” to “rigged.” Many are now questioning its future. It’s like watching the franchise evaporate before our very eyes:
Abdul’s Folly Raises Questions of Show’s Authenticity
Some “American Idol” fans and critics are crying foul after judge Paula Abdul said on Ryan Seacrest’s radio show Wednesday that she saw contestant Jason Castro sing during a dress rehearsal and that’s part of the reason she got confused when she critiqued him.
Abdul’s admission, which some argued supports the idea that the show is scripted and that the judges peek at performances before their live debuts, came in response to her Tuesday night blunder in which she evaluated a song Castro hadn’t even sung. Abdul’s folly was the latest in a string of bizarre incidents since she’s been on the show.
Can ‘American Idol’ survive Abdul’s slip?
May 4, 2008 – “American Idol” is a fraud. That’s what people are speculating, after Paula Abdul’s widely talked about “Idol” gaffe on Tuesday night. To which I say, Duh.
Come on, people, we’ve known for years that “Idol” isn’t really a completely democratic music appreciation show. There’s got to be loads of behind-the-scenes manipulation going on. There just hasn’t been that much hard proof.
Tuesday’s bizarre blunder doesn’t constitute concrete evidence either, but it’s as close as we’ve come, and it may be enough to bring things crashing down.
Story found here
The television show American Idol has been faced with one problem after another. Their ratings have taken a major dip this season. Could the nation finally be tired of idolatry.
This week, Paula Abdul caused controversy with comments she made live on the air. Two weeks ago, former contestant, Carmen Rasmusen, told the press the show is rigged. Some called it sour grapes, but others didn’t.
Paula Abdul’s conduct this week is only serving to affirm those claims. A few days ago, live on the air, Paula Abdul, reading from a card, complimented the first performance by a contestant, but slammed the second one. There’s just one problem. He only performed one song. As a result, critics and audiences all over the internet are now proclaiming the show is rigged.