Robert S. Mueller
This a follow up to yesterday’s article FBI Lawsuit Update – Part 2. As standard in Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) cases with very incriminating files the FBI/DOJ wishes to hide in violation of FOIA, the FBI/DOJ have been stonewalling me in court, using the same flawed, lawless arguments they’ve used VERBATIM in other cases, according to Pacer searches, to violate the Freedom of Information Act. So much for government transparency in the Obama Administration.
The following is a link to the case documents, revealing their unlawful argument that the Civil Rights Act and Civil Rights Act of 1964 do not apply to the FBI, DOJ and FBI Director Robert S. Mueller and as such, they do not have to obey said laws, which is a blatant lie.
The fact of the matter is the FBI and DOJ receive “federal financial assistance” and under the Civil Rights Act, they are not allowed to discriminate against anyone.
Robert S. Mueller cowardly invoked the U.S. government’s “immunity shield” in the case, as he broke the law at my expense. However, there exists no “immunity shield” granting any member of the U.S. government to break the law.
They are hiding the FOIA files I am entitled to, as the files relating to the Madonna case are really bad and the files regarding Robert S. Mueller violating my Fourth Amendment rights, are incriminating to him.
Therefore, there is a conflict of interest in him not releasing the files, as he broke the law in spying on me and others, in misconduct I outed him for online in a time stamped, copyrighted 2006 article proven true and correct 3 months later via the report of the U.S. government’s Inspector General. Mueller and FBI agents were later excoriated for the misconduct in the U.S. Congress in what became a scandal they had to address.
Robert S. Mueller had their legal representation in the case state it is at his discretion whether or not the FBI brings justice in cases. He deliberately ordered FBI agents to drag their feet on the investigation though my life is in danger and instructed them to conceal the Freedom of Information Act files, to allow Madonna and co. to further steal copyrights.
Mueller is also a man that for years deliberately sat on the terrible financial crimes of Bernard Madoff and R. Allen Stanford. This ladies and gentlemen is why the economy collapsed – the man that has been left in charge of law enforcement kisses up to rich criminals, allowing them to steal from hardworking people, as that is crooked Muller’s definition of success. To anyone else with any sense, that’s a house of cards waiting to collapse…and it did.
Madonna and co. are still criminally stealing from my Copyrighted Catalog. Her ex-husband and father of her child, Guy Ritchie and his alleged film “Sherlock Holmes” is a complete rip off a years old, preexisting copyright from my Copyrighted Catalog.
Guy Ritchie’s rip off
Guy Ritchie stole the modern remake idea from my copyrights – then stole other years old scenes from my preexisting, Library of Congress registered, Copyrighted Catalog that contains 12,500 songs, 1000 movie scripts, movie treatments and short stories, 15 book manuscripts, 300 music video treatments, 500 photographs, 100 photo treatments, perfume, clothing line, nano-technology, a solar cell phone and thousands of other items.
Guy Ritchie is disgusting – every film he has ever made has a copyright infringement lawsuit against it, as he steals everyone else’s property. He’s been sued in five unrelated cases by different people for stealing their movie scripts and TV projects.
He recently announced he is starting a record label. Ritchie, who knows nothing about music and is famous for having sex with a crazy pop star, is starting a record label. No doubt, it is to steal.
In all of this, FBI Director Robert S. Mueller reminds me of the lead Nazi the film, The Aryan Couple, criminally taking and redistributing the property of others to fellow Nazis, under a sick, racist premise that whites are superior to others and everyone else is slave labor to exploit.
The only massive problem is, while Mueller unlawfully helps dirty Hollywood stars in lining their pockets via criminally stealing copyrights whose proceeds are meant to go towards cures to AIDS and Cancer, millions of people are dying from the aforementioned diseases. God is not going to bless you all for that. God have mercy on your souls.
If It Continues The Judiciary Report Will Not Vote For Or Support Him In 2012
U.S. President Barack Obama
The FBI, DOJ and Robert S. Mueller are currently trying to get Judge Martinez to make a precedent setting ruling that the Civil Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 did not give black people equal rights under the law, equal access to law enforcement services and does not apply to the FBI, DOJ and its employees, claiming they are exempt from the legal consequences of violating the Civil Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which they have done at my expense.
Judge Jose E. Martinez (left) a former Department of Justice employee is presiding over the case Aisha v. FBI/Department of Justice.
Carole M. Fernandez’s legal premise should alarm the 40 million black people in America and 100 million minorities in the United States as well. Following her offensive legal premise, if the FBI, DOJ or any of its counterparts wish to harass, terrorize, assault, beat or harass you, invade your privacy, bring back slavery, deny you entrance to restaurants, gyms or schools and block you from receiving law enforcement services, in violation of the Civil Rights Act and Civil Rights Act of 1964, according to her, due to the fact they work for the U.S. government, they can violate said the Civil Rights Act and Civil Rights Act of 1964, as it does not apply to them. Let that sink in.
Obama’s Attorney General, Eric Holder, is head of the Justice Department, is aiding FBI Director Robert S. Mueller in hiding incriminating Freedom of Information Act documents
The judge presiding over the case is Jose E. Martinez, who according to biographical information, was the regional director of the Office for Drug Abuse Law Enforcement of Defendant the Department of Justice from 1972 to 1974.
Carole M. Fernandez, is attempting to get Judge Jose E. Martinez to rule according to this unlawful premise, which would in essence, make it case law that the FBI, DOJ and its employees are exempt from observing and following the Civil Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
It’s bad enough I sustained a life threatening, unprecedented brain hemorrhage thanks to the FBI’s criminal negligence in the case, in allowing Madonna to rob me of copyrights and engage members of her sick Miami Kabbalah cult, located in Eastern Shores (Miami), to stalk, approach, harass and assault me. When I denounced the FBI’s criminal negligence online, an FBI employee contacted by email and phone and harassed and threatened me, in tandem with her co-worker. I had the brain hemorrhage shortly after, as that’s when it dawned on me they had no intention of bringing justice in the case.
And this is after I furnished them with credible information in writing and verbally in 2005, that was used during the Anthony Pellicano trial to help secure a conviction. Words from what I wrote was used verbatim in the trial.
The FBI vowed three times to me they are investigating the Madonna case and would issue a report on it, which is standard in said investigations, but they lied and I almost died as a result. That should let the public know the FBI can’t be trusted and their word means nothing, so be careful about telling them anything, as their promises are worthless. They are treacherous and dishonorable.
When you see a law enforcement agency repeatedly sued by its own agents for racism and retaliation against minority agents, as the FBI has been, watch out, they are racist and hateful towards minority victims of crime as well.
Robert S. Mueller – tried to hide behind the government’s “Immunity Shield” in the lawsuit, for unlawfully wiretapping me, scanning my emails and using the FBI’s software Trojan CIPAV to gain access to my computer documents
Currently, I’m still struggling with the lingering effects of the unprecedented brain hemorrhage and due to medication that I was prescribed by Jackson Memorial Hospital, for the terrible headaches and head pains associated with the hemorrhage, Topamax, I developed another life threatening medical issue, known as Metabolic Acidosis, which sent me to the emergency room on November 25, 2009. I have discontinued the medication.
However, rather than do the honorable thing, via making amends for their misconduct and releasing the Freedom of Information Act files I am entitled to under the law, Obama’s FBI and Justice Department decided while I’m sick is the time to strike and antagonize me with deceit and roundabout motions, stonewalling a physically sick person.
Never mind, I’m still being harassed and stalked by Madonna’s Kabbalah kooks and the copyright infringement has not desisted, therefore the FBI/DOJ have deliberately failed to do their jobs. There was another incident on New Years Eve, in the afternoon, where a crazy Kabbalah member I have seen before, stalked me for three blocks when I went for a walk in my neighborhood, then charged at me with her menacing dog. If I hadn’t quickly crossed the street I would have been attacked.
The FBI has no excuse. I even entered into court evidence last week, a DVD disc of cell phone photos of Miami Kabbalah members that have stalked, approached and harassed me. One recently followed me into a bank and harassed me in the presence of my mother. She said she is a member of the Miami branch of Kabbalah and had the red string bracelet on. These Kabbalah members should not be following and coming up to me, as it is illegal.
Obama Violating Campaign Promise On Transparency
Obama and his Department Of Justice have been under fire recently for their blatant lack of transparency. They stonewalled the U.S. Congress in the aftermath of Fort Hood. They stonewalled Alan Keyes in his lawsuit to determine Obama’s citizenship status, via violating the Freedom of Information Act in improperly withholding incriminating documents. That case is scheduled for a hearing this month. Obama’s Department Of Justice was sanctioned by a Kansas Court this week for lack of transparency and a refusal to answer questions during discovery.
Now they are stonewalling me on the Freedom of Information Act files I properly requested and now sued for, even though my life is at stake, which under Department Of Justice rules, is a reason FOIA files must be released.
My life is at stake two fold – if I sustain another hemorrhage, which can occur due to harassment and undue stress (like Madonna and Kabbalah are still doing), it has a high probably of being FATAL. In addition, Kabbalah members are still stalking, harassing and trying to attack me at Madonna’s behest – a cult whose members have been in murderous confrontations with innocent people (Fiona Davis, Gideon Busch and others).
If Obama’s DOJ, FBI and Robert S. Mueller, along with their legal representation, Carole A. Fernandez, continue to deprive me of my rights in court, the FOIA documents I’m entitled to and what I am due under the law as a result of the FBI, DOJ and Robert S. Mueller’s misconduct,
I SHALL NOT BE VOTING FOR OBAMA IN THE 2012 ELECTION AND SHALL ADVISE THE MILLIONS OF PEOPLE THAT READ MY WEBSITES NOT TO VOTE FOR HIM EITHER. THIS SITE WILL SUPPORT OBAMA NO LONGER.
FROM THE WHITE HOUSE WEBSITE (OBAMA):
Freedom of Information Act
MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES
SUBJECT: Freedom of Information Act
A democracy requires accountability, and accountability requires transparency. As Justice Louis Brandeis wrote, “sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants.” In our democracy, the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), which encourages accountability through transparency, is the most prominent expression of a profound national commitment to ensuring an open Government. At the heart of that commitment is the idea that accountability is in the interest of the Government and the citizenry alike.
The Freedom of Information Act should be administered with a clear presumption: In the face of doubt, openness prevails. The Government should not keep information confidential merely because public officials might be embarrassed by disclosure, because errors and failures might be revealed, or because of speculative or abstract fears. Nondisclosure should never be based on an effort to protect the personal interests of Government officials at the expense of those they are supposed to serve. In responding to requests under the FOIA, executive branch agencies (agencies) should act promptly and in a spirit of cooperation, recognizing that such agencies are servants of the public.
All agencies should adopt a presumption in favor of disclosure, in order to renew their commitment to the principles embodied in FOIA, and to usher in a new era of open Government. The presumption of disclosure should be applied to all decisions involving FOIA.
The presumption of disclosure also means that agencies should take affirmative steps to make information public. They should not wait for specific requests from the public. All agencies should use modern technology to inform citizens about what is known and done by their Government. Disclosure should be timely.
I direct the Attorney General to issue new guidelines governing the FOIA to the heads of executive departments and agencies, reaffirming the commitment to accountability and transparency, and to publish such guidelines in the Federal Register. In doing so, the Attorney General should review FOIA reports produced by the agencies under Executive Order 13392 of December 14, 2005. I also direct the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to update guidance to the agencies to increase and improve information dissemination to the public, including through the use of new technologies, and to publish such guidance in theFederal Register.
This memorandum does not create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
The Director of the Office of Management and Budget is hereby authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.
Aisha v. FBI
Robert S. Mueller
In light of what happened last time in the Aisha v. Madonna case, the great incivility I was met with and the manner in which my human rights and Constitutional rights were vilely trampled, in violation of the law, I am going to disclose all items concerning the case on this website to let you the public view and decide, with the hope it leads to greater government accountability and transparency (as Obama promised the world). The following are a list of updates thus far, since the filing of the case on August 31, 2009.
The case number for the Aisha v. FBI lawsuit is 09-22574-CIV-MARTINEZ-BROWN. The clerk forgot to stamp the case number on the lawsuit the day it was filed.
The judge is Jose Martinez. The magistrate judge is Steven Brown (the same magistrate judge from the 2005 Aisha v. Madonna case).
On September 1, 2009, the day after the case was filed, the judge issued a nine page order stating he wants a “Scheduling Conference” meeting between both parties click here
In the aforementioned judicial order regarding the “Scheduling Conference” the judge also requested a “Certificate of Interest” be filed by each side. I filed my “Certificate of Interest” a few weeks ago click here
I sent a copy of the 11 page “Scheduling Conference” order, in compliance with the judge’s aforementioned request, along with a cover letter, to the FBI’s lawyer click here
The three defendants Robert Mueller, The FBI and DOJ were served on September 15, 2009 and as they are a government agency, they have 60 days to respond, as opposed to the standard 20 click here
I filed a motion to correct to reflect a few minor errors (spelling of a name ect.) click here
Here is the mailing receipt showing confirmation of President Obama/White House receiving my letter and an advance draft of the Aisha v. FBI lawsuit click here.
I did not wish to write to Obama about this subject, but Robert Mueller and the FBI’s severe criminal negligence, left me no choice, as my life has been placed in danger. Repeated incidents of severe harassment that began increasing in frequency and becoming more hostile, clearly illustrates Madonna and co. are escalating their criminal and violent commissioned misconduct towards me, building up to something very bad.
Enough is enough. I haven’t done anything to these people, don’t know them and want nothing to do with them. I do not wish to end up dead like Michael Jackson and Sam Cooke, because a certain set of people are trying to steal my Copyrighted Catalog. What a disgrace those thieves are, going to such sick, evil extremes to steal from innocent people.
I recently filed a formal complaint with the DOJ Inspector General, regarding Mueller and co.’s misconduct in my case, as the Department of Justice’s website, states one is to do so under said circumstances.
Singer Cheryl Cole of Girls Aloud and Simon Cowell on his show X-Factor
Regarding the ongoing infringements, Sony still leads the pack with the most instances of criminal copyright infringement.
Recent incidents of criminal copyright infringement include “Happy” by Leona Lewis via Syco(Simon Cowell)/Sony Music.
The video for “Bad Boys” by Alexandra Burke via Syco(Simon Cowell)/Sony Music, with Bryan Barber criminally taking credit and payment for my preexisting copyright, Syco passed to him.
“Fight For This Love” by Simon Cowell’s “X-Factor” co-host Cheryl Cole, with Steve Kipner, Andre Merritt and Wayne Wilkins criminally taking credit and payment for my preexisting copyright, Syco and co. passed to them.
And other new infringing items by Chris Brown (Sony) and his girlfriend Rihanna, who continue to steal from the Copyrighted Catalog.
Madonna’s latest single “Celebration” is also a criminal copyright infringement of a preexisting song in my Copyrighted Catalog, of the same name, which has been copyrighted for years.
PLEASE BOYCOTT ALL THE AFOREMENTIONED ARTISTS AND SONY
The illegal hacking into my computers by Madonna’s hackers at Digilink that is also of a very malicious nature, to not only snoop on the contents of my computers, but to damage and destroy the local copy of my websites in bids at blocking them from being updated six days a week, continues unabated.
This is amazingly occurring in spite of the aforementioned FBI lawsuit and the agency’s alleged pledge on their website regarding “preventing crime.” Apparently the sick Hollywood stars in the case, can say whatever garbage pops out of their illiterate, thieving mouths and onto their vile websites, but the Constitution and international human rights charters do not apply to me, via the right to having free speech and freed press.
There was also a vile, unlawful incident of harassment and terrorization geared towards my mother by a Kabbalah affiliate (Madonna’s cult) as retaliation for me filing the FBI lawsuit. I am going to enter it into the case and post it to the site. When you read about what transpired, it is going to disgust and appall you. My mother nearly had a heart attack due to it and ended up in the hospital on September 30, 2009. She has since been released. She has since been released from the hospital.
As previously mentioned, on August 31, 2009, there was an incident at the Federal courthouse, via a red string bracelet wearing Kabbalah member and felon, named Alexis A. Palme, who followed me into said courthouse (his photo ID is on file, as one must show it to enter the building), after being sent to intimidate and browbeat me, on federal property (a felonious no-no), into not filing the FBI lawsuit, disclosing Madonna and Kabbalah’s sick misconduct (which I filed anyway).
FBI Director Robert S. Mueller
FBI Director Robert S. Mueller, the FBI and DOJ, have been sued in the Madonna human rights abuse case, under the Freedom of Information Act and the Civil Rights Act. To read the lawsuit click here.
Be sure to read the parts about her famous producers, friends, associates, staff members and Kabbalah members, contacting and approaching me on her behalf and the part about Kabbalah member Russell Davies’ sick misconduct in conjunction with her (press ctrl F and then type in his name Russell Davies). I will post a summary of the lawsuit shortly.
During the George W. Bush administration, I filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the FBI. First they lied in writing and stated there were no files. Then, when I pressed the issue some more with a written “appeal” of their decision, they stated in writing there are files and they are withholding them and I’d have to sue them to get it, so I did today.
The FBI has been withholding thousands of pages in files relating to the case and other items concerning me, in violation of the Freedom of Information Act.
When Obama ran for President, he promised “Change” in America. He also promised “transparency” in government, something that was sorely lacking during the Bush years.
Therefore, it is in this vein that I filed the lawsuit. A rough draft of the lawsuit, along with a polite, respectful letter was sent to Obama on July 15. 2009, which the U.S. Postal Service confirms the White House has received.
It was a last resort, as Madonna’s conduct is endangering my very life, as the lawsuit details and the FBI’s criminal negligence and cover-up thereof, has caused me extensive damage as well. Madonna, through her staff, famous producers, associates and friends, keeps contacting me and harassing me.
Marcia G. Cook (center)
As many of you know, I sued Madonna/Sony in 2005 and the case was corrupted by her. It was thrown out without being read, by Miami Judge and George W. Bush appointee, Marcia G. Cook (the magistrate judge was Stephen Brown).
She is the same judge that violated the Constitution to aid Bush, who for the first time in U.S. history, held a man in prison for years, without charging him for a crime. 400 years of painstaking law was thrown out the window, marking a profound low in the Judiciary’s history.
Cook further stated the case, which involved assault and death threats against me was, “Amusing.” Yes, really. That’s the word she inexcusably used in her ruling, while stating pop stars could not have broken the law. She reminds me of verbally abusive, Judge Kent, who was recently impeached.
She threw it out, clearly without reading it, the same day she received it, according to the court’s case transfer sheet. My case was not the only one she had that day, as she had dozens. Therefore, she could not have possibly read the 60 pages of the lawsuit, 200 pages of evidence exhibits and Gigabytes of comparative data illustrating infringements.
In short, she committed fraud. People do not pay their taxes and court filing fees, for their cases not to be read and reviewed correctly. That spits in the taxpayers faces, who pay judges salaries and is a violation of the judicial canons.
She also stated something in her ruling, that was riddled with misspellings and misapplied law, that I was instructed to cut the case down to 50 pages, when I was told to cut it down to “60 pages” by her colleague, who was the judge that had the case first, Cecilia Altonaga.
Madonna and her cohorts kept stealing items from my preexisting Copyrighted Catalog and Altonaga ignored the motion for an injunction to bar her from stealing anything else, which I thought was strange.
Then, she and the Defendants called me into court for a hearing in December 2005, where she basically treated me the victim, like a criminal and the lawbreaking Defendants’ lawyers, like royalty.
She even sarcastically told me to “Try state court” which is absolutely the wrong venue for a copyright case, as copyrights pertain to federal law and federal court. I’ve seen other copyright cases dismissed from state court with the court stating it is the wrong venue. I can’t imagine as a judge, Altonaga did not know this. I politely requested in a motion that she recuse herself.
She was acting in the Defendants’ best financial interest, not in the interest of justice and truth. Turns out, Altonaga’s child had been given stock in the Defendants’ company (Sony) and her husband works for the law firm, Holland and Knight as a partner and Sony is one of their biggest clients. That’s a multi-million dollar account. So they put food on her table and as such, she ruled in their favor.
R. Allen Stanford was arrested a few months ago for running a ponzi scheme
It’s this same sort of thing that allowed R. Allen Stanford to win a case in Miami he should not have. It’s a shame, as had integrity prevailed in the case years ago, when a man formally sued and accused him in court, of running a ponzi scheme, providing proof thereof, investors in America, Britain and the Caribbean, would have saved billions of their hardearned life savings.
This year it was revealed, the FBI also knew since 1998, what Stanford was doing in running a ponzi scheme, but kept silent, allowing it to continue, instead of arresting him and stopping the financial damages a decade ago, which grew to terrible proportions over the last 10 years.
The case against Stanford was dismissed and the innocent, truth telling Plaintiff, was ordered to pay that crook Stanford $300,000 in court costs and damages. Talk about corrupt. Read about it by clicking here. Stanford’s chief financial officer has now pled guilty, disclosing their criminal misconduct.
As stated above, Obama promised “change” and “transparency” in government. So, let’s see if things have changed regarding the government, court system and corporate America or if my rights will be corruptly violated again in court.
It will also be a bellwether to you, the business owner and the domestic/global investor, as to the true state of things in the corporate and court sector.
I filed the case in the appropriate jurisdiction, under the appropriate laws, it is formatted according to the rules of federal procedure and I have successful proved access and misconduct that are a proximate cause of the clear cut damages I sustained.
The case has been assigned to judge Jose Martinez. However, the magistrate judge providing oversight, is the same one from the 2005 Madonna case, judge Stephen Brown (18 magistrate judges and I get the same one again). However, once again, I’m going to act in good faith.
I will post all the details of the case as it transpires, every single aspect, on the Judiciary Report and its affiliated sites. I’m also asking you to forward the lawsuit link to as many people as possible, to create awareness about the case.
The more people that know about it, the less inclined those Hollywood Kabbalah loons should be, in continuing to harass and terrorize me.
Obama Creates Cyber Security Branch
President Barack Obama
Today, President Barack Obama announced the creation of a Cyber Security department of the U.S. government to combat hacks into the national internet infrastructure.
Presently, the FBI has a computer intrusion department named “CIP” that goes by other names as well, but their performance has been very poor in stopping major hacks into domestic government and private sector computer networks.
Just last week, I read a feedback column link that led to an article featuring a U.S. general stating America may begin to respond to cyber attacks with military force.
During the press conference today, President Obama spoke of people breaking the law by “hacking” into computers and “stealing intellectual property” (copyrights, trademarks and patents).
Note to Madonna: he’s talking about you, witch!
President Obama even referred to a company that lost $400,000,000 via this criminal practice. It appears Madonna and her associates in Hollywood have set the new standard for dirty business dealings in this regard among criminals, creating a nasty template for others to follow. Hollywood private investigator, Anthony Pellicano, had hackers on staff that specialized in this deceitful, illegal practice. Madonna was one of his clients.
As many of you have also witnessed, when I write something on the site that is unflattering about Madonna, my websites (and computers) get hacked, sabotaged and delayed.
Intellectual property theft is vile, cowardly, lazy and disgraceful. It says to the country and the world, one is too dumb and untalented to author creative works, therefore one will take the dishonorable route of stealing from others’ federally registered intellectual property.
In my case, the thefts of my copyrights became very malicious and sick. For example, Madonna’s cohorts at Lions Gate, a defendant in the 2005 Aisha v. Madonna case, which the latter bought out in violation of criminal statues, went so far, as to arrogantly and criminally steal more copyrights from me two years later in 2007.
The commercial and critical flop “Good Luck Chuck” was stolen from my copyrights. To be nasty, this is what they did with my preexisting copyright they butchered with their stupidity and vileness.
My preexisting copyright was a wonderful, romantic, fictitious movie treatment I wrote about an affluent man on a dating site and women finding out about it and flocking to him. The later released Lions Gate film “Good Luck Chuck” is about an affluent man, whose profile is posted on a dating site and women flocking to him.
That’s an illegal duplication of my copyright, which Madonna criminally gained an unlawfully made copy of, along with my voluminous Copyrighted Catalog, via criminal hacking, performed by Digilink, the company that began hosting her website Madonna.com several years ago.
Here’s where it gets really sick. In the infringing film “Good Luck Chuck” they added items not in my copyright, such as crass, pornographic sex scenes and a character named ANISHA which is one letter away from my real, legal name AISHA. Not to mention, the lead female character in the film, played by Jessica Alba, is named “CAM” and one of my private nicknames I use is “KAM” short for my middle name KAMILAH. They are both pronounced the same as well.
It was a stupid and criminally incriminating thing to do. The infringing film “Good Luck Chuck” constitutes major violations of the law and is more than enough to obtain a devastating indictment and convictions, for all involved, for criminal copyright infringement, computer intrusion and violations of various human rights laws.
Here’s where the infringement “Good Luck Chuck” gets even sicker. The character ANISHA starts off as an 8-year-old girl (which coincidentally is the age I immigrated to America from Jamaica).
To be nasty, they made this character a goth 8-year-old virgin wearing a leather bra, trying to lose her virginity in a closet with an 8-year-old boy (never happened to me by the way, as I took a Christian vow of chastity until marriage, which I wrote about on my site a few years ago in the Q&A section).
However, Lions Gate turned my wholesome, romantic, copyright about a grown, affluent man on a dating site and grown women finding out about it and flocking to him, into a nasty, depraved, promiscuous piece of pornographic garbage.
The nasty PEDOPHILES at Lions Gate should be locked up for not only criminal copyright infringement and hacking, but for filming and broadcasting that piece of nastiness featuring the character ANISHA, an 8-year-old, underage, preteen girl in a black leather bra, skimpy skirt, black lipstick and goth hairstyle, trying to have sex in a closet with an 8-year-old boy. The scene is disgusting and PEDOPHILIC. You’re nasty PEDOPHILES for thinking that is filmable entertainment.
It reveals the sick levels of mental illness present in Hollywood that they could do something so deplorable. This is the terrible level of mental illness the FBI has running loose around the streets of Los Angeles.
Hollywood is disgusting and severely mentally ill. You need serious counseling with a side order of institutionalization.
Imagine that. I have been quietly working on copyrights and patents to improve people’s health and you animals are criminally robbing and defaming me with my own copyrighted work, in criminal violation of the law. What nasty message do you think that sends to the public about you.
But, it is the same sick pattern of mental illness rearing its ugly head throughout the case I reported to the FBI that they claim they are investigating.
As mentioned the other day, Madonna recently, criminally stole another of my preexisting copyrights, that has been sitting in the Library of Congress in D.C. from 2006, that is my life story and ripped it off in a sick, obsessive manner, for her so-called directorial debut “Filth And Wisdom.”
The lead character in Madonna’s rip off “Filth And Wisdom” is an immigrant named A.K. aspiring to be a singer, writer and poet. In my 2006 preexisting copyrighted movie script, I star in the biopic as myself, an immigrant aspiring to be a singer, writer and poet, whose initials are A.K. (short for “Aisha Kamilah”).
What kind of sickos criminally steal copyrights from a writer, then include the defrauded writer’s name in the script as a character. That screams severe mental illness and sends the nation and the world a horrific message about Hollywood.
Madonna and co. even stole one of my copyrights about my homeland Jamaica, where I lived for years and Miami, where I’ve lived for two and a half decades, adding slurs to the script, sure to offend Jamaica and even started making arrangements to fly to Jamaica to begin filming it.
I’ve quietly been living in Miami for 25 years. I have no criminal record or history of strange conduct. I have a genius level IQ and spend my time at home, on my computers, doing research work and authoring patents and copyrights. I spend a lot of time authoring items for science and medical patents, to improve people’s health and quality of life.
I don’t bother people. I don’t go to clubs, industry parties, none of that. Yet, the aforementioned animals in Hollywood have been viciously targeting, robbing and attacking me, unprovoked and invading my privacy in very sick ways.
Who could be happy or pleased with that kind of criminal interference in their life. It’s disgraceful. The human rights abuses and civil rights violations I have been subjected to are so sick.
Her conduct and that of her cronies in Hollywood has been ugly and unjustifiable. There is no excuse for it.
Obama’s Remarks On Cybersecurity
Friday, May 29, 2009 – President Obama’s remarks on his administration’s cybersecurity review on Friday in the East Room of the White House:
…I know how it feels to have privacy violated because it has happened to me and the people around me. It’s no secret that my presidential campaign harnessed the Internet and technology to transform our politics. What isn’t widely known is that during the general election hackers managed to penetrate our computer systems. To all of you who donated to our campaign, I want you to all rest assured, our fundraising website was untouched. (Laughter.) So your confidential personal and financial information was protected.
But between August and October, hackers gained access to emails and a range of campaign files, from policy position papers to travel plans. And we worked closely with the CIA — with the FBI and the Secret Service and hired security consultants to restore the security of our systems. It was a powerful reminder: In this Information Age, one of your greatest strengths — in our case, our ability to communicate to a wide range of supporters through the Internet — could also be one of your greatest vulnerabilities…
But every day we see waves of cyber thieves trolling for sensitive information — the disgruntled employee on the inside, the lone hacker a thousand miles away, organized crime, the industrial spy and, increasingly, foreign intelligence services. In one brazen act last year, thieves used stolen credit card information to steal millions of dollars from 130 ATM machines in 49 cities around the world — and they did it in just 30 minutes. A single employee of an American company was convicted of stealing intellectual property reportedly worth $400 million. It’s been estimated that last year alone cyber criminals stole intellectual property from businesses worldwide worth up to $1 trillion.
In short, America’s economic prosperity in the 21st century will depend on cybersecurity…
This new approach starts at the top, with this commitment from me: From now on, our digital infrastructure — the networks and computers we depend on every day — will be treated as they should be: as a strategic national asset. Protecting this infrastructure will be a national security priority. We will ensure that these networks are secure, trustworthy and resilient. We will deter, prevent, detect, and defend against attacks and recover quickly from any disruptions or damage.
To give these efforts the high-level focus and attention they deserve — and as part of the new, single National Security Staff announced this week — I’m creating a new office here at the White House that will be led by the Cybersecurity Coordinator. Because of the critical importance of this work, I will personally select this official. I’ll depend on this official in all matters relating to cybersecurity, and this official will have my full support and regular access to me as we confront these challenges…